Sara
AI employees / Sara · Audit & compliance

Sara

Three of the 142 don't reconcile. I've held them and attached the evidence.

142
documents in the run below
6h → 1m 54s
median per compliance report
1.6%
documentation error rate
24/7
evidence intake
The process she owns

Every line of a compliance report has to be backed by evidence somebody can check.

Her responsibility starts the moment evidence arrives and ends the moment your compliance lead signs. Inside that stretch she checks everything against your own checklist rather than a general standard, and she is measured on what she refuses as much as on what she passes. The signature stays human. What changes is that by the time it is asked for, there is nothing left to verify.

The artifact

The evidence validation sheet, exactly as Sara filed it.

Every line carries the check that produced it, and anything held stays visible with its reason attached. Structure and logic from a live deployment; values changed.

ConsoleTue 24 Jun 15:38
Sara — terminal norte · run 4471
SaraAudit & complianceNeeds review
Terminal Norte · run 4471142documents2held for a person
IMG_4471.jpgSeal intact at departure · 19.43 / −99.13 matches the declared stopClear
IMG_4472.jpgCargo temperature log · location matchesClear
IMG_4488.jpgSeal intact on arrival · 21.16 / −100.93 · 340 km off routeHeld
IMG_4491.jpgDriver signature page · no location data embeddedHeld
DOC_0912.pdfWeighbridge ticket · no location expectedClear
Field note · WhatsApp · 11:04

«El sello se rompió al abrir en la rampa 4. Mandé foto con el supervisor presente, pero desde mi teléfono personal.»

Sara’s decision

The note explains the broken seal but not the 340 km discrepancy, and a personal handset accounts for the missing location data. She keeps both files held and asks the terminal supervisor to re-shoot from the company device.

run 4471 · closed 11:52 by R. Salinas, Compliance Lead2 holds upheld · 1 released after re-shootFull audit trail →

What Sara does.

Every capability is trained on your checklists, your document taxonomy and your regulator — not a default template.

01

Reads every document against your checklist

The checklist your compliance team actually wrote, item by item, applied to every file that arrives.

02

Certifies where the evidence came from

Location and timestamp metadata checked against the declared site, so a photograph from the wrong place never passes as proof.

IMG_3391 · 19.4326, −99.1332 · 14:22 · matches route MX-03 — certified
03

Files evidence into your taxonomy

Photographs, voice notes, PDFs and scans sorted into the categories your archive already uses, named the way your auditors expect.

04

Finds the outlier in the batch

Patterns across hundreds of records — a date out of range, a signature that never arrived, the same photograph submitted twice.

3 anomalies in Q2 batch — duplicate image hash, out-of-range date, missing signature
05

Files the report with the trail attached

Audit-ready in your own format, every conclusion traceable back to the file and the check that produced it.

06

Flags a checklist that has gone stale

She watches the regulation your process is built on and tells your lead when the rule moved and the checklist didn't.

Sound like what your compliance queue needs?
How she gets specialized

She doesn't arrive knowing your operation. She's taught it, on your records, before she touches a live run.

Four stages. You see her calls next to your team's before anything is delegated.

Weeks 1–2

Diagnostic

Someone from our forward-deployment team works your compliance queue by hand for two weeks — the real bottlenecks, the real exceptions.

Weeks 3–4

Your checklist, ingested

Item by item, including the unwritten rules your senior auditor carries in her head. Permissions scoped per system in the same pass.

Weeks 5–8

Shadow mode

She reviews six months of closed runs and writes nothing. You compare her holds to the ones your team made, and disagreements go back into the checklist.

Month 3

Live

She reads, classifies, holds and escalates. Your lead signs. Scope widens only when you widen it.

First usable results in weeks · full operation ≈ 3 months
Reach

No new platform. She works inside what your team already opens every morning.

Nobody learns a dashboard. Evidence keeps arriving on WhatsApp the way it always has; the report lands where your auditors already look for it.

Systems
SAPOdooGoogle DriveSharePointWhatsApp BusinessGmail+ any system with an API
Evidence she can read
Field photographsVoice notesPDFsScanned documentsEmail attachments+ anything else you send
In production in
LogisticsManufacturingConstructionHuman resourcesPublic sector+ more
Languages
Spanish · English
Same checklist, either language, in one run
Regions
Mexico · US · LatAm
Data stays in the region you nominate
Availability
24 / 7 / 365
Evidence read as it lands, not in a batch
Time to launch
≈ 3 months
First usable results inside the first weeks
Scope, escalation and error

What she can reach, what she can't, and what happens when she's wrong.

Every permission is set by you, per system, and visible on the trust page. Sara reads widely and writes almost nowhere — which is the point.

Permissions, as deployed
SystemReadWrite
SAP · compliance moduleyesreports only
Google Workspace · evidence driveyesno
WhatsApp Business · field intakeyesreplies only
Payment systemsnono
HR filesnono
Sign-off on a filed reportn/anever
When something doesn't reconcile
01 · Hold

She holds the file rather than guessing, and names the check that failed. A held item is never silently dropped from the report.

02 · Escalate to a named person

Within 60 seconds, to the owner you nominated for that site — on WhatsApp and by email, with the file and the failed check attached.

03 · When she's wrong

She's wrong on about 1.6% of documents — most often a false hold on a legitimate file. Your lead reverses it in one click, the reversal enters the audit log, and the reason writes back into the checklist.

04 · The line she doesn't cross

Sara cannot sign off a compliance report. That stays with your compliance lead, on the record, with her name on it.

Results

The workload, redistributed.

What a compliance team of four was carrying alone, and what it looks like after Sara has been through shadow mode and gone live.

Before
Your team, alone.
Manual review hours / week42
Documentation error rate12%
Runs actually reviewed18%
With Sara
The same team, on the exceptions.
Manual review hours / week2
Documentation error rate1.6%
Runs actually reviewed100%
One national logistics operator, fourteen terminals · six months before and after go-live · nobody was let go; the two senior auditors moved onto carrier disputes.
99.7×
Logistics

Field compliance in under two minutes

Six hours per report, arriving weeks after the run. Sara reads the on-site evidence as it lands, validates the metadata and files the same hour.

National carrier · MX · NDA
80%
Human resources

Expired documents, found before the inspector

Sara sweeps four fifths of the employee file base for lapsed certifications and missing signatures, and reports what's about to expire rather than what already has.

Services group · MX · NDA
Zero
Public sector

Documentation findings at third-party audit

A government deployment cleared its external audit with no documentation findings raised. Scope, permissions and audit trail were reviewed by the agency's own security team before go-live.

Government entity · MX · under NDA

Put Sara on your compliance queue.

Two weeks of diagnostic on your real evidence, with our forward-deployment team on site.

Talk to us on WhatsApp
No commitment · 2-week diagnostic · clear proposal